Evaluating Program Effectiveness: Addressing Criminogenic Needs

Robin LaBarbera • March 10, 2025

Two programs are successfully addressing criminogenic needs: World Impact's TUMI seminary-level education program offered in prisons across the US, and House of Mercy's re-entry ministry in Washington state. These two organizations are effectively reducing reoffending by focusing on addressing criminogenic needs. In this post, we highlight House of Mercy Ministries

As program evaluators, our role is to collect and analyze data to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of programs, initiatives, and organizations. Our evaluations help determine whether these efforts are achieving their intended goals and highlight areas for improvement by examining their outcomes and impact on target populations. Essentially, program evaluation is a structured approach to measuring a program’s success and identifying where adjustments may be needed.

Two notable projects we have recently evaluated are World Impact's prison ministry and House of Mercy's re-entry ministry. These programs have demonstrated measurable success, significantly reducing recidivism by addressing key criminogenic needs among individuals involved in the justice system. In this post, we focus on the impactful work of House of Mercy.

Understanding Criminogenic Needs and Their Impact on Recidivism

Before delving into the data, it is essential to understand criminogenic needs and their relationship to re-offending.

What Are Criminogenic Needs?

Criminogenic needs are factors that directly contribute to criminal behavior and recidivism. Research has identified six primary criminogenic risk factors:

Anti-Social Cognitions/Criminal Thinking: Individuals who display anti-social cognitions often don’t show concern about how their actions affect others and may not feel any remorse for what they have done. Their thought patterns often reinforce participation in criminal activities through self-interest, minimization of pro-social activities, and denial of responsibility for behavior.
Anti-Social Peers/Associates: Associating with others who engage in criminal behavior increases the likelihood of someone recidivating. Someone who is immersed in a group of peers who continue to commit unlawful acts is more likely to commit more crimes.
Family and Marital Relations: Someone who lives in a dysfunctional family is more likely to be in a setting where they learn criminal behaviors. Such individuals may not have positive role models within the home to help teach pro-social values.
Work and School: When employment is unstable and individuals have had limited school achievement, they are more likely to engage in criminal activity.
Leisure and Recreation: Individuals who report fewer leisure and recreational activities that are pro-social are more likely to engage in criminal behavior than those who report more frequent engagement in these activities.
Substance Abuse: Research shows a relationship between substance abuse and criminal behavior. The prevalence of alcohol and drug use is 4 times higher among offenders than in the general population. Evaluations of substance abuse treatment programs have generally established treatment as an effective tool at reducing drug use and crime, according to research (Wooditch, Tang, and Taxman, 2014).

Addressing Criminogenic Needs Through Intervention

A study by Brooks Holliday, Heilbrun, and Fretz (2012) examined an intervention targeting criminogenic risk factors. The program involved 71 male residents under the custody of the New Jersey Department of Corrections. Participants attended lectures covering topics such as antisocial attitudes, criminal thinking patterns, substance abuse, and behavioral patterns. Individual and group counseling sessions based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) helped participants address deficits in these areas. The study found a significant improvement in participants’ criminogenic needs.

Further research by Wooditch, Tang, and Taxman (2014) reinforced these findings. Their study of 251 probationers participating in an 18-session intensive CBT program demonstrated significant improvements in family relationships, engagement in pro-social activities, and reductions in substance use.

House of Mercy's Approach to Reducing Recidivism

Evidence-based programs that address criminogenic needs play a crucial role in reducing recidivism. House of Mercy is one such organization committed to supporting formerly incarcerated individuals through comprehensive reentry programs.

Our ongoing evaluation of House of Mercy has yielded encouraging results, with consistent improvements in key areas:

Perceptions of Program Impact: Participants highly value House of Mercy’s reentry program, particularly its focus on life skills, prosocial behaviors, and community engagement.
Cognitive Adaptability: Participants demonstrate strong adaptive thinking skills when faced with stressful life events, a critical factor for successful reentry.
Coping Strategies: Evaluations indicate that participants exhibit psychological resilience, grit, and effective problem-solving skills, all of which contribute to positive reentry outcomes.
Social Support: House of Mercy provides robust mentoring, relationship-building opportunities, and emotional support, which have been identified as critical factors in reducing recidivism.
Employment and Education: Participants report high levels of satisfaction with their employment and educational trajectories, indicating that House of Mercy’s workforce development initiatives are making a meaningful impact.

Transforming Lives and Communities

Both World Impact and House of Mercy are dedicated to breaking cycles of crime and facilitating positive life changes through education, employment support, prosocial cognition, and relationship-building. These efforts not only transform individual lives but also contribute to the broader goal of safer, more stable communities.

Through ongoing research and program evaluation, we continue to support initiatives that address criminogenic needs, ultimately reducing recidivism and improving reentry outcomes.

Want to learn more about how to partner with us to evaluate your social impact program and maximize your impact? Learn more about our evaluation services here.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Incarcerated men in white uniforms stand in a circle with arms around each other's shoulders, heads

The Brotherhood Nobody Expected

By Robin LaBarbera • June 1, 2026

Faith-based education does more than teach — it builds brotherhood. New research reveals how community drives transformation in prison.

Community, connection, and belonging — the markers of flourishing (credit: Shutterstock).

What Does Flourishing Look Like After Prison? House of Mercy Has Some Answers

By Robin LaBarbera • May 26, 2026

Can data reveal human flourishing after prison? Five rounds of reentry evaluation at House of Mercy say yes.

What Does Flourishing Look Like Behind Bars?

By Robin LaBarbera • April 16, 2026

When we think about prison education, we tend to ask one question: Does it reduce recidivism? It's a reasonable question, but it may be the wrong one. My recently published study in the Journal of Global Education and Research asked a different question: Does participating in a seminary-level theological education program actually change how people flourish while they're still incarcerated and after they come home? The answer, across 266 participants in six facilities and four states, was yes. Participants in The Urban Ministry Institute (TUMI) prison program showed higher scores on established well-being measures, healthier thinking patterns, stronger coping skills, and more positive relationships than comparison groups. And those gains didn't evaporate at the gate. Program graduates in reentry carried the markers of flourishing into post-release life. What flourishing actually looks like Flourishing isn't a soft concept. Drawing on Diener's Flourishing Scale, a validated instrument used in positive psychology research, the study measured constructs such as purpose, engagement, meaning, and positive relationships. These aren't warm feelings. They're measurable conditions that predict sustained behavior change. What the data showed was this: when incarcerated men and women are given access to rigorous academic study grounded in community and accountability, something shifts. Not just in what they know, but in who they are becoming. The research identified five mechanisms driving that transformation: deep educational engagement, authentic peer community, relational accountability, future-oriented purpose, and restorative action through mentorship. Each reinforces the others. Together, they create the conditions for the kind of change that lasts. Why this matters beyond the research Policymakers, funders, and program designers consistently reach for recidivism as their primary metric. But recidivism tells us something quite narrow — whether someone returned to prison within a given window. It tells us almost nothing about whether a person is living well, contributing to their community, or building a meaningful life. If we want justice systems that actually produce human flourishing, we need to measure what flourishing looks like. And we need to fund and design programs that create the conditions for it. Faith-based theological education in prison, when done with rigor and relational integrity, does that. The full peer-reviewed article, "Religious Higher Education in Prison in the United States: The Importance of Well-Being," is published in the Journal of Global Education and Research (Vol. 10, Issue 2, 2026). Read it here.

Transformation in Prison (credit: Shutterstock)

Transformation Behind Bars: Why Long-Term Prison Stories Matter

By Robin LaBarbera • February 1, 2026

We rarely discuss people serving life sentences who've genuinely transformed. Karen Brown's 40-year journey shows why we should.

Bringing Dignity to Our Unhoused Friends

By Robin LaBarbera • September 5, 2025

What does dignity look like for our unhoused neighbors? Sometimes it is a shower, sometimes it is a mailbox, sometimes it is simply being seen.

Urban neighborhood, community chaplaincy, human flourishing (credit: Shutterstock).

When Flourishing Misses the Point

By Robin LaBarbera • July 9, 2025

Measuring flourishing is not simply about identifying domains or creating a reliable tool. It requires asking questions in a way that respects the dignity and lived experience of the people responding. That cannot be done from a distance. It requires proximity.