New Publication: Exploring the Impact of Theological Education on Incarcerated Lives
Robin LaBarbera • May 30, 2025
I’m excited to share that my latest peer-reviewed article has just been published online in Health & Justice.
The study, titled “A mixed methods evaluation of well-being among incarcerated religious education participants in the United States,” examines how a rigorous theological education program—The Urban Ministry Institute (TUMI)—is changing lives inside prison walls.
Drawing on a mixed-methods study of incarcerated men and women serving long-term or life sentences, this article explores how participation in TUMI shapes identity, relationships, purpose, and overall well-being.
The findings point to measurable increases in hope, sense of meaning, and prosocial behavior, suggesting that even in the most dehumanizing environments, transformation is possible.
This research contributes to a growing body of evidence showing the value of high-quality educational programs in correctional settings—not only for reducing recidivism but for fostering human flourishing.
You can read the full article online here (open access):
If you’re working in the fields of education, criminal justice, reentry, or faith-based programming—or simply interested in stories of transformation and resilience—I hope this article sparks ideas and conversations.
Feel free to share your thoughts or reach out if you’re interested in collaboration or evaluation work in this space.

When we think about prison education, we tend to ask one question: Does it reduce recidivism? It's a reasonable question, but it may be the wrong one. My recently published study in the Journal of Global Education and Research asked a different question: Does participating in a seminary-level theological education program actually change how people flourish while they're still incarcerated and after they come home? The answer, across 266 participants in six facilities and four states, was yes. Participants in The Urban Ministry Institute (TUMI) prison program showed higher scores on established well-being measures, healthier thinking patterns, stronger coping skills, and more positive relationships than comparison groups. And those gains didn't evaporate at the gate. Program graduates in reentry carried the markers of flourishing into post-release life. What flourishing actually looks like Flourishing isn't a soft concept. Drawing on Diener's Flourishing Scale, a validated instrument used in positive psychology research, the study measured constructs such as purpose, engagement, meaning, and positive relationships. These aren't warm feelings. They're measurable conditions that predict sustained behavior change. What the data showed was this: when incarcerated men and women are given access to rigorous academic study grounded in community and accountability, something shifts. Not just in what they know, but in who they are becoming. The research identified five mechanisms driving that transformation: deep educational engagement, authentic peer community, relational accountability, future-oriented purpose, and restorative action through mentorship. Each reinforces the others. Together, they create the conditions for the kind of change that lasts. Why this matters beyond the research Policymakers, funders, and program designers consistently reach for recidivism as their primary metric. But recidivism tells us something quite narrow — whether someone returned to prison within a given window. It tells us almost nothing about whether a person is living well, contributing to their community, or building a meaningful life. If we want justice systems that actually produce human flourishing, we need to measure what flourishing looks like. And we need to fund and design programs that create the conditions for it. Faith-based theological education in prison, when done with rigor and relational integrity, does that. The full peer-reviewed article, "Religious Higher Education in Prison in the United States: The Importance of Well-Being," is published in the Journal of Global Education and Research (Vol. 10, Issue 2, 2026). Read it here.









