Does looking at yourself on Zoom impact learning?

Robin LaBarbera • January 4, 2022

The answer might surprise you.

With the increase in remote learning and use of virtual learning environments these days, and perhaps no end in sight due to recent covid surges, many are left wondering how different conditions might impact student learning (e.g., video cameras on/off). Some of our clients at LaBarbera Learning Solutions, for whom we’ve developed online learning courses, have also questioned whether their students should keep their cameras on.


I just spent two years in a doctoral program delivered entirely through Zoom, and I often wondered whether seeing my own face on the screen during synchronous class meetings (and not being particularly fond of the image I saw) was a distraction that impacted my learning. 


There have been several arguments in the literature revolving around the idea that requiring cameras to be on during synchronous class sessions “could increase student anxiety and self-consciousness, heightening a feeling of being constantly watched which could impede students paying attention to the material,” researchers Austin, Fogler, and Daniel (2021) pointed out.


It turns out that seeing one’s face and those of classmates did not result in negative learning outcomes, the study from James Madison University has found. 


The study surveyed 155 undergraduate students at a large university in an online classroom who were assigned to one of three video conditions: no video, see only others, and see self and others. The no-video group kept their cameras off so they could not see images of themselves or other participants while they watched a recorded lecture. In the see only others condition, participant video cameras were turned on, but each participant hid their self-view, seeing only other participants. In the see self and others group, participants were able to see themselves and their classmates while watching the video lecture. All participants were then tested on the material.


“Contrary to speculation regarding student learning outcomes with cameras on, students who saw the video feed of themselves and other students (Condition 3) during the lecture had the highest quiz scores,” the researchers said. 


These findings suggest that there are no negative impacts on quiz performance when students were asked to keep their cameras on. It may also be true that “cameras on helps to increase self-awareness in a positive fashion and, combined with the presence of other students, perhaps impacts accountability or engagement.”


They found something else interesting: Students who could see others, but had their self-view hidden (Condition 2) expressed discomfort with not being able to see themselves. “This seems to be counter to the arguments made by educators that students who see themselves would experience increased self-consciousness and anxiety” said Austin, Fogler, and Daniel.


Of course these findings may not be the case for every individual who attends an online class session. Nevertheless, the researchers conclude that, “for educators wondering how the use of video cameras may be affecting student attention and learning in virtual classrooms, these results indicate no significant detriment to learning associated with asking students to turn their cameras on during a video lecture. In fact, contrary to the arguments of many, we found an increase in performance when all cameras are on.”


Incarcerated men in white uniforms stand in a circle with arms around each other's shoulders, heads
By Robin LaBarbera June 1, 2026
Faith-based education does more than teach — it builds brotherhood. New research reveals how community drives transformation in prison.
Community, connection, and belonging — the markers of flourishing (credit: Shutterstock).
By Robin LaBarbera May 26, 2026
Can data reveal human flourishing after prison? Five rounds of reentry evaluation at House of Mercy say yes.
By Robin LaBarbera April 16, 2026
When we think about prison education, we tend to ask one question: Does it reduce recidivism? It's a reasonable question, but it may be the wrong one. My recently published study in the Journal of Global Education and Research asked a different question: Does participating in a seminary-level theological education program actually change how people flourish while they're still incarcerated and after they come home? The answer, across 266 participants in six facilities and four states, was yes. Participants in The Urban Ministry Institute (TUMI) prison program showed higher scores on established well-being measures, healthier thinking patterns, stronger coping skills, and more positive relationships than comparison groups. And those gains didn't evaporate at the gate. Program graduates in reentry carried the markers of flourishing into post-release life. What flourishing actually looks like Flourishing isn't a soft concept. Drawing on Diener's Flourishing Scale, a validated instrument used in positive psychology research, the study measured constructs such as purpose, engagement, meaning, and positive relationships. These aren't warm feelings. They're measurable conditions that predict sustained behavior change. What the data showed was this: when incarcerated men and women are given access to rigorous academic study grounded in community and accountability, something shifts. Not just in what they know, but in who they are becoming. The research identified five mechanisms driving that transformation: deep educational engagement, authentic peer community, relational accountability, future-oriented purpose, and restorative action through mentorship. Each reinforces the others. Together, they create the conditions for the kind of change that lasts. Why this matters beyond the research Policymakers, funders, and program designers consistently reach for recidivism as their primary metric. But recidivism tells us something quite narrow — whether someone returned to prison within a given window. It tells us almost nothing about whether a person is living well, contributing to their community, or building a meaningful life. If we want justice systems that actually produce human flourishing, we need to measure what flourishing looks like. And we need to fund and design programs that create the conditions for it. Faith-based theological education in prison, when done with rigor and relational integrity, does that. The full peer-reviewed article, "Religious Higher Education in Prison in the United States: The Importance of Well-Being," is published in the Journal of Global Education and Research (Vol. 10, Issue 2, 2026). Read it here.
Transformation in Prison (credit: Shutterstock)
By Robin LaBarbera February 1, 2026
We rarely discuss people serving life sentences who've genuinely transformed. Karen Brown's 40-year journey shows why we should.
Mi
By Robin LaBarbera September 5, 2025
What does dignity look like for our unhoused neighbors? Sometimes it is a shower, sometimes it is a mailbox, sometimes it is simply being seen.
Urban neighborhood, community chaplaincy, human flourishing (credit: Shutterstock).
By Robin LaBarbera July 9, 2025
Measuring flourishing is not simply about identifying domains or creating a reliable tool. It requires asking questions in a way that respects the dignity and lived experience of the people responding. That cannot be done from a distance. It requires proximity.
By Robin LaBarbera June 2, 2025
This is why prison education isn’t just a moral argument—it’s a practical one. It reduces future crime. It lowers costs. It strengthens communities. And it saves lives, sometimes in the most unexpected places.
credit: Shutterstock
By Robin LaBarbera May 30, 2025
This research contributes to a growing body of evidence showing the value of high-quality educational programs in correctional settings—not only for reducing recidivism but for fostering human flourishing.
love your neighbor (credit: Shutterstock)
By Robin LaBarbera May 29, 2025
Mary Flin’s example challenges me to rethink what it means to serve, to listen, and to love my own neighbors. Her life is a living answer to the question: What if every neighborhood had a chaplain?
Human flourishing behind bars
By Robin LaBarbera May 15, 2025
The evidence is clear: faith-based educational programs like The Urban Ministry Institute offer far more than theological training—they cultivate well-being, leadership, and resilience among incarcerated individuals.